From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C767C7F37 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:32:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <51768D8E.2060207@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:33:02 -0500 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: capture the failure result of 310 References: <5175FC5C.5020607@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5175FC5C.5020607@huawei.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Zhao Hongjiang Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Thanks for making the suggested changes. FYI it helps the review process if you include a version log below the header something like. Capture the failure by the way of counting dmesg errors and describe how the test triggers problems. Signed-off-by: Zhao Hongjiang [eguan@redhat.com fix common file path and other cleanups] --- V1: Initial version V2: Added suggestions from xxx@somewhere.org to fix something Reworked logic for function blah Minor description change, other than that, it looks good. --Rich Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs