From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DF57F37 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:43:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF14304064 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.142]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id pnYBxWYHFRkuxAkl for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nat.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.85.79]:62774 helo=mail.lmb.internal) by ppsw-42.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtp id 1UUfNq-0004Hw-9P (Exim 4.80_167-5a66dd3) for xfs@oss.sgi.com (return-path ); Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:43:54 +0100 Received: from cpepc210-3.lmb.internal ([10.21.64.91]) by mail.lmb.internal with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1UUfNq-0006s0-PJ for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:43:54 +0100 Message-ID: <5176AC3E.30801@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:43:58 +0100 From: Dave Howorth MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfsprogs: manpage spelling fixes References: <5175BB8F.5090604@sandeen.net> <5175BC20.9010403@sandeen.net> <5176A639.5020703@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <5176A639.5020703@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Rich Johnston wrote: >> diff --git a/man/man8/mkfs.xfs.8 b/man/man8/mkfs.xfs.8 > #rcj serialisation is misspelled, should be serialization. That depends on where you live, of course. It is derived from a Latin root, I think, so should have an 's'. At least, where I live. Do manpages have a policy as regards spelling? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs