Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix log space reservation calculation if log stripe unit is specified

[Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>]

On 05/01/13 10:58, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> About two weeks ago, Dave has found an issue by running xfstests/297.
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00273.html
>
> According to our previous discussion, if the log stripe unit is configured, we should
> take it into account as it will dynamically increase the log reservation twice of it
> per ticket.
>
> This patch is trying to fix it by checking the given log space against the maximum
> request among those transactions(this procedure is implemented similar to xfsprogs/mkfs/maxres.c),
> because the fundamental limit is that no single transaction can be larger than half of the log.
> Also, looks at least another two log stripe unit should be added when calculating the minimum log
> space, or else I can simply trigger a DEAD LOOP via create large number of files, I think I need
> some time to digest Dave's comments posted on original bug ticket, i.e.
>>> >>  The question is this: how much space do we need to reserve. I'm
>>> >>  thinking a minimum of 4*lsu - 2*lsu for the existing CIL context, and
>>> >>  another 2*lsu for any queued ticket waiting for space to come
>>> >>  available.
>
> Put simply, with this fix, mount a partition with an improper log space setup vs log stripe
> unit will failed although mkfs still works. Ah, maybe we can improve the user space xfs_mkfs
> with some pre-checkup similar to the implementation inside kernel?  Besides that, it will
> drop a warning to syslog and the suggested log space for the given log stripe unit is shown
> there, which looks like the following:
>
> # mkfs.xfs -f -b size=512 -d agcount=16,su=256k,sw=12 -l su=256k,size=2560b /dev/sdb1
> meta-data=/dev/sdb1              isize=256    agcount=16, agsize=524288 blks
>           =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=0
> data     =                       bsize=512    blocks=8388608, imaxpct=25
>           =                       sunit=512    swidth=6144 blks
> naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0
> log      =internal log           bsize=512    blocks=2560, version=2
>           =                       sectsz=512   sunit=512 blks, lazy-count=1
> realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
>

Shouldn't mkfs.xfs also know it is building a filesystem that cannot be 
mounted?

When mkfs.xfs is given a log stripe unit is greater than 256KB, should 
we divide the specified log stripe unit by 2 until it is under 256KB 
rather than reset to 32KB?

> # mount /dev/sdb1 /xfs1
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1,
>         missing codepage or helper program, or other error
>         In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
>         dmesg | tail  or so
>
> # dmesg:
> .......
> XFS (sdb1): log space of 2560 blocks too small, minimum request 6656
> XFS (sdb1): log space validation failed
> XFS (sdb1): log mount failed
>
>
> Tests:
> Ran some cases in xfstests as well as a few self-defined Bonnie++/FIO tests with above
> configuration(6656 log blocks), looks the current fix works, at least no crash to me.:)
>
> But I have not yet dig into the detailed of how the suggested minimum log space would
> affect the performance, given that the AIL push thresholds is defined to 25% of the log
> space, a small logs might introduce IO overheads for pushing AIL too frequently.
> In addition, considering the backgroup CIL commit threshold is 1/8 of the log, this would
> also impact the log IO throughput IMHO.  Maybe we can figure out an optimized log space
> combine those two cases and drop it to syslog along with the minimum size?
>

I think 1 MB is the smallest log size before we soft hang even without 
stripe units define.

>
> To Dave,
>
> Sorry for the delay in drop this patch since I have mentioned that I'll post a fix
> last night.  However, I have ran into an issue when testing it by creating/removing a
> tons of files in parallel at that time:(

The iclog buffers have to be a multiple of the log stripe unit or we 
start punching the lsn in places that it should not. I think the idea 
that was mentioned is to remove the power of two on the iclog buffer 
size and replace with multiple of log stripe unit.

http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00039.html

--Mark.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs