From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA947F55 for ; Fri, 3 May 2013 08:06:18 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5183B652.8020300@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 08:06:26 -0500 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/276 - stop all fsstress before exiting References: <517A10B1.7040107@redhat.com> <517A3C49.9090703@jan-o-sch.net> <7DC41D7F-396D-4769-B573-816E80372456@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <7DC41D7F-396D-4769-B573-816E80372456@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: linux-btrfs , Jan Schmidt , xfs-oss On 04/26/2013 08:10 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:35 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Fri, April 26, 2013 at 07:29 (+0200), Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> Tests after 276 were failing because the background fsstress >>> hadn't quit prior to exit, devices couldn't be unmounted, etc. >> >> I don't see how that would happen. Any further insight? >> > Yes, sorry for not including it. The parent process was killed, but the fsstress processes just got reparented to init. > > I tried for a while to use pkill to knock them of first but this seems simpler, actually. > > Eric > Jan, with Eric's explanation, may I put your Reviewed-by: on this patch? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs