From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29])
	by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED17629DF8
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon,  6 May 2013 16:53:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11])
	by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37E9304064
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon,  6 May 2013 14:53:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with
	ESMTP id sOjgph45J6vQOAtQ for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Mon, 06 May 2013 14:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5188266E.9020705@sandeen.net>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 16:53:50 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Internal error xfs_sb_read_verify at line 726
References: <20130506112717.GA502@x4> <5187E290.8090109@sandeen.net>
	<20130506183020.GA513@x4> <51880121.8000001@sandeen.net>
	<20130506192629.GA503@x4>
In-Reply-To: <20130506192629.GA503@x4>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com

On 5/6/13 2:26 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:

...

> OK, makes sense. Thanks. 
> I like your patch better, so lets use it.
> 

Actually - why don't you go ahead & formally submit your patch with my
suggested changes; it was your good idea to use EWRONGFS.  :)

-Eric

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs