From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE1829E15 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 15:40:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD75AC002 for ; Wed, 8 May 2013 13:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 0FhPZonJU0paeCL7 for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 13:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <518AB837.7050603@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 15:40:23 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs v3.1.11 PLEASE LOOK AT THIS References: <518A9E7E.7070402@sgi.com> <518AA3AE.4090407@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <518AA3AE.4090407@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Rich Johnston Cc: xfs-external On 5/8/13 2:12 PM, Rich Johnston wrote: > OOPS I meant to get internal verification about the deprecated message first. Please disregard the above lines. It's correct anyway ;) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs