From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE9129DF8 for ; Thu, 9 May 2013 14:47:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <518BFD56.9080605@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 14:47:34 -0500 From: Rich Johnston MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add execution of a custom command to fsstress (-x and -X options) References: <1363863585-25598-1-git-send-email-list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net> <20130321195054.GO17758@dastard> <514B72B9.1010005@jan-o-sch.net> <20130321211218.GP17758@dastard> <514C0309.1000104@jan-o-sch.net> <20130324235135.GH6369@dastard> <515EBE9E.3000905@jan-o-sch.net> <5183CCFB.8060505@jan-o-sch.net> In-Reply-To: <5183CCFB.8060505@jan-o-sch.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Schmidt Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 05/03/2013 09:43 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote: > > Looks like there are no suggestions how to make -x useful for multiple workers. > Can we then have the single worker solution (original patch) merged for now? > > -Jan I don't see why not. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Rich Johnston _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs