From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7947CBF for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 18:27:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D15AC001 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 16:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og119.obsmtp.com (exprod7og119.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.16]) by cuda.sgi.com with SMTP id 4sIqNJ6oOXPdpUCw (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 16:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <519176E7.8070204@genband.com> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 17:27:35 -0600 From: Chris Friesen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: 2.6.27-based kernel failing xfstests xfs/182 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers , Alex Elder , xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi, I'm working on an embedded system running a 2.6.27-based kernel. I'm digging into some intermittent xfs corruption issues. Yes, I realize the right answer is probably to upgrade, but for the usual embedded reasons that's tricky. I'm seeing test xfs/182 fail with 40 or so files showing messages like: file /opt/xfstest2/960 has incorrect size - sync failed In our case the xfs filesystems used for testing are on top of lvm, which is in turn on top of two SAS drives in RAID1. Any suggestions on where I should start looking? I'm looking at the "do_sync() and XFSQA test 182 failures...." thread on the mailing list from 2008, can someone point me to the commit that eventually resulted from that? Thanks, Chris -- Chris Friesen Software Designer www.genband.com office:+1.343.883.2717 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs