From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DF67F37 for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 02:13:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AD2AC002 for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 00:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id RWm53vS7pgP9vHRn (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 00:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id c13so2884728ieb.24 for ; Wed, 15 May 2013 00:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51933585.80400@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 03:13:09 -0400 From: "Michael L. Semon" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Rambling noise #2: Learning to use the v8 pquota/uquota patchset References: <5191FB46.2080300@gmail.com> <519241A1.9050704@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <519241A1.9050704@oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jeff Liu Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 05/14/2013 09:52 AM, Jeff Liu wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Have you tried this patch set with the v2 user space changes? > > Looks this is the latest update from Chandra that I can searched from > the mailing list: > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-07/msg00293.html > > Thanks, > -Jeff It looks like it's not patching very well in light of Dave's CRC userspace changes, and I botched the mkfs part of the merge. For xfsprogs include/xfs_sb.h, Patch #1 has this: +#define XFS_SB_VERSION2_NO_OQUOTA 0x00000100 /* sep prj quota inode */ However, in the current xfsprogs include/xfs_sb.h, there is this line: #define XFS_SB_VERSION2_CRCBIT 0x00000100 /* metadata CRCs */ This overloaded meaning of 0x00000100 did not seem right, so after my failure with the finished mkfs.xfs, it was time to go back to the current git xfsprogs. I'm sure that the userspace will be reworked before the kernel code is final. I'll show some patience, and Dave's upcoming CRC code activation will probably force me to back Chandra's patchset out anyway. Despite my bumbling through it all, the kernel gquota/pquota patchset shows promise. Thanks! Michael P.S. - I applied your xfs_growfs_data_private patch, and all seems well so far. In particular, there was no change in the test results from `./check -xfs -g growfs`. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs