Re: Rambling noise #2: Learning to use the v8 pquota/uquota patchset

["Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@gmail.com>]

On 05/15/2013 04:41 PM, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 04:52 -0400, Michael L. Semon wrote:
>> Hi!  I seem to have no luck in getting v8 of the pquota/uquota patchset
>> working and have it pass xfstests with flying colors.  Is v8 of the
>> pquota/gquota patchset sufficient to make the new separate pquota/gquota
>> bits work?  Or is it an incremental patchset?
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I will post the user level changes that accompanies these changes.
>
> With those changes you can do a new mkfs and use pquota and gquota
> together.
>
> Regards,
>
> Chandra

Excellent!

As for the rest of your issues, I'll have to retest very slowly using 
your new userspace patches, documenting every step in order.  It will 
also require before/after runs of xfstests.

I do not know what your patches do for filesystems that already had 
quota on them, so I ask you to check one thing.  It looked like the 
result of the normal `quota` command was having issues.  On my root 
filesystem that was mounted uquota only, the following is the normal 
behavior (as an ordinary user):

mls:~$ quota
Disk quotas for user mls (uid 3001):
      Filesystem  blocks   quota   limit   grace   files   quota   limit 
   grace
       /dev/sda1  165955  262144  327680            2345    8194   16384

However, before I switched out kernels here, such a command just left a 
blank, as if there was no quota there.  If you would at that to your 
list of spot-check tests, that would be great.  It might work fine for 
you.  [For the same situation, `xfs_quota -c quota /` worked just fine.]

You're leading a blind man in the dark, so I thank you for your patience.

Michael

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs