From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E27E29E03 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 22:04:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9D78F8040 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 20:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-f178.google.com (mail-ie0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3Lyt8AJAdYSJpk0h (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 20:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id b11so4138179iee.9 for ; Tue, 21 May 2013 20:04:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <519C3596.7080109@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 23:03:50 -0400 From: "Michael L. Semon" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: generic/258 questions (mount issue)... References: <519C14A1.8000009@gmail.com> <20130522012620.GA29466@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20130522012620.GA29466@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 05/21/2013 09:26 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:43:13PM -0400, Michael L. Semon wrote: >> Hi! When using xfstests generic/258 with along with $TEST_RTDEV >> $TEST_LOGDEV, it tends to scream bloody murder about corrupted >> partitions and such. In fact, the commands in the test seem to do >> the right thing when executed by hand. So once again, I grasped for >> straws and came up with this: >> >> --- xfstests/tests/generic/258.orig 2013-05-21 20:19:38.430754829 -0400 >> +++ xfstests/tests/generic/258 2013-05-21 20:10:11.509021368 -0400 >> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ >> # unmount, remount, and check the timestamp >> echo "Remounting to flush cache" >> umount $TEST_DEV >> -mount $TEST_DEV $TEST_DIR >> +_test_mount >> >> # Should yield -315593940 (prior to epoch) >> echo "Testing for negative seconds since epoch" >> >> My questions are these: >> >> 1) Was there a better way to do this? > > No, your change is correct. Can you clean up the description of the > problem you had and add a Signed-off-by? > >> 2) Not knowing the policy on umounting $TEST_DEV, could this have >> been a test for $SCRATCH_DEV? > > There are a handful of other tests that also unmount the TEST_DEV. > Perhaps adding a _test_umount() wrapper to common/rc (similar to > _scratch_umount) would be best. At least shared/243 needs the same > _test_mount treatment as this test. > > Cheers, > > Dave. > This is my first attempt at doing a `git format-patch --stdout`. Hopefully, this is somewhat more presentable to git. Comments and brow-beating are welcome. Thanks! Michael >>From 7dc0667e1f8cd1c98f15ebf412dd0f038b55306e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Michael L. Semon" Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:50:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Change mount method for generic/258 Use the built-in _test_mount function from xfstests so it will use the correct mount options for xfstests. The script used a simple umount-and-mount sequence, which caused a test failure on an XFS filesystem that used both realtime and external log devices. Signed-off-by: Michael L. Semon --- tests/generic/258 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/generic/258 b/tests/generic/258 index fb091ae..3aeb5ce 100755 --- a/tests/generic/258 +++ b/tests/generic/258 @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ fi # unmount, remount, and check the timestamp echo "Remounting to flush cache" umount $TEST_DEV -mount $TEST_DEV $TEST_DIR +_test_mount # Should yield -315593940 (prior to epoch) echo "Testing for negative seconds since epoch" -- 1.8.2 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs