From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA9529DF8 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:06:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3975BAC001 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 2013 19:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ishtar.tlinx.org (ishtar.tlinx.org [173.164.175.65]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kWHZSzGKIf4BBPnv (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 02 Jun 2013 19:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51ABFA1F.2050402@tlinx.org> Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 19:06:23 -0700 From: Linda Walsh MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: latest xfsdump page allocation failure order:4 in 3.9.2 References: <51ABEA86.9060008@tlinx.org> <20130603014220.GW29466@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20130603014220.GW29466@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs-oss Dave Chinner wrote: > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 05:59:50PM -0700, Linda A. Walsh wrote: >> [123342.934683] xfsdump: page allocation failure: order:4, mode:0x10c0d0 > Fixed in 3.10-rc1 by: > dd700d9 xfs: fallback to vmalloc for large buffers in xfs_attrlist_by_handle > Cheers, > Dave. ---- Why does this often sound like patch is in the mail...? :-) Thanks.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs