From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: bpm@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] xfs: increase number of ACL entries for V5 superblocks
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:08:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AD13E6.2090502@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370237332-24757-7-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
On 06/03/13 00:28, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner<dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> The limit of 25 ACL entries is arbitrary, but baked into the on-disk
> format. For version 5 superblocks, increase it to the maximum nuber
> of ACLs that can fit into a single xattr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster<bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> @@ -189,16 +193,17 @@ xfs_set_acl(struct inode *inode, int type, struct posix_acl *acl)
>
> if (acl) {
> struct xfs_acl *xfs_acl;
> - int len;
> + int len = XFS_ACL_SIZE(ip->i_mount);
>
> - xfs_acl = kzalloc(sizeof(struct xfs_acl), GFP_KERNEL);
> + xfs_acl = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
Isn't that physical contiguous allocator? wouldn't a virtual contiguous
be good enough for the acl?
...
> if (type == ACL_TYPE_ACCESS) {
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_acl.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_acl.h
> index 39632d9..0da8725 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_acl.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_acl.h
> @@ -22,19 +22,35 @@ struct inode;
> struct posix_acl;
> struct xfs_inode;
>
> -#define XFS_ACL_MAX_ENTRIES 25
> #define XFS_ACL_NOT_PRESENT (-1)
>
> /* On-disk XFS access control list structure */
> +struct xfs_acl_entry {
> + __be32 ae_tag;
> + __be32 ae_id;
> + __be16 ae_perm;
> + __be16 ae_pad; /* fill the implicit hole in the structure */
> +};
> +
> struct xfs_acl {
> - __be32 acl_cnt;
> - struct xfs_acl_entry {
> - __be32 ae_tag;
> - __be32 ae_id;
> - __be16 ae_perm;
> - } acl_entry[XFS_ACL_MAX_ENTRIES];
> + __be32 acl_cnt;
> + struct xfs_acl_entry acl_entry[0];
> };
>
> +/*
> + * The number of ACL entries allowed is defined by the on-disk format.
> + * For v4 superblocks, that is limited to 25 entries. For v5 superblocks, it is
> + * limited only by the maximum size of the xattr that stores the information.
> + */
> +#define XFS_ACL_MAX_ENTRIES(mp) \
> + (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb) \
> + ? (XATTR_SIZE_MAX - sizeof(__be32)) / sizeof(struct xfs_acl_entry) \
> + : 25)
XFS_ACL_MAX_ENTRIES(mp) == (65536 - 4) / 12 == 5461
> +
> +#define XFS_ACL_SIZE(mp) \
> + (sizeof(struct xfs_acl) + \
> + sizeof(struct xfs_acl_entry) * XFS_ACL_MAX_ENTRIES((mp)))
XFS_ACL_SIZE(mp) == (4 + 12) + 12 * ((64K - 4) / 12) == 65548
Did you want to add in the sizeof(struct xfs_acl) to the first term or
the sizeof(__be32)? I would think the acl_entry[0] is the start of the
array.
> +
> /* On-disk XFS extended attribute names */
> #define SGI_ACL_FILE (unsigned char *)"SGI_ACL_FILE"
> #define SGI_ACL_DEFAULT (unsigned char *)"SGI_ACL_DEFAULT"
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-03 5:28 [PATCH 0/6] xfs: fixes for 3.10-rc4 Dave Chinner
2013-06-03 5:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: rework dquot CRCs Dave Chinner
2013-06-03 18:18 ` Brian Foster
2013-06-04 21:46 ` Ben Myers
2013-06-04 22:07 ` Ben Myers
2013-06-03 5:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: fix log recovery transaction item reordering Dave Chinner
2013-06-03 5:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: inode unlinked list needs to recalculate the inode CRC Dave Chinner
2013-06-03 18:18 ` Brian Foster
2013-06-04 3:06 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-03 5:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: fix remote attribute invalidation for a leaf Dave Chinner
2013-06-03 18:59 ` Brian Foster
2013-06-03 19:09 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-06-04 3:13 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-04 22:28 ` Ben Myers
2013-06-03 5:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: disable noattr2/attr2 mount options for CRC enabled filesystems Dave Chinner
2013-06-03 19:02 ` Brian Foster
2013-06-03 21:38 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-06-05 1:49 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-03 5:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: increase number of ACL entries for V5 superblocks Dave Chinner
2013-06-03 22:08 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
2013-06-04 3:26 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-05 1:58 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-04 15:34 ` Ben Myers
2013-06-04 22:29 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-04 22:32 ` Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AD13E6.2090502@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox