From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717CE29DF8 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:12:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFE8304053 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7m3r3LWD8XiUp7TD for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51B7CAEC.9000101@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:12:12 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: attack upon XFS, misinformation abounds, linux-raid list References: <51B45CFD.20500@hardwarefreak.com> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Steve Bergman Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On 6/11/2013 2:12 AM, Steve Bergman wrote: > Stan Hoeppner hardwarefreak.com> writes: > >> but this one may be worth a read at least > > How flattering that you felt you needed to seek out reinforcements. :-) More like, "Hay guys, some dude is talking smack about Mom." ;) Seriously though, expanding the participant list to the devs has been a positive thing overall, has it not? Worth noting, I've been a subscriber to the XFS list for a few years--no seeking was required. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs