From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0384429DFA for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:53:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from eagdhcp-232-136.americas.sgi.com (eagdhcp-232-136.americas.sgi.com [128.162.232.136]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF291304064 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:53:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51BA0710.8050108@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:53:20 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: fix the symbolic link assert in xfs_ifree References: <20130613170449.144027450@sgi.com> <51BA065E.8010101@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <51BA065E.8010101@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 06/13/13 12:50, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 06/13/13 12:04, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> race_xfs_readlink(ip); >> + > Augh, one of those days - oops I got the wrong trace in this version of the patch... should be trace_xfs_symlink_inactive(ip) added in xfs_trace.h _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs