From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDE27F37 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:18:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E53304032 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id HDO4mhrRbEBQ2P1H for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903EC6C10A for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:18:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <51BF0CB9.3060008@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:18:49 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: definitions for /proc/fs/xfs/stat References: <20130615020414.GB29338@dastard> <20130616001130.GE29338@dastard> <419435719.1662203.1371431489790.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <20130617024603.GJ29338@dastard> <1597962722.1767244.1371447710942.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <20130617111940.GM29338@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20130617111940.GM29338@dastard> Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 6/17/2013 6:19 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > I mean, Linus said Direct IO is for deranged monkeys, so nobody > should ever use direct IO, right? ;) As it turns out, there are simply far more deranged monkeys running loose than Linus anticipated. :) -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs