From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C5C7F37 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 08:54:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFD430405F for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 06:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FHtZfKEi2qoJDsxi for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 06:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51DC1600.7080906@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:54:08 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: inode64 and Firefox References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: aurfalien Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote: > Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox? However, this isn't encouraging: $ file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped $ ./summarise_stat.pl /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox 1 100.0% use 32-bit stat() family interfaces only sooo if my perl script is to be believed, it may be problematic, depending on how serious a stat() failure is. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs