* inode64 and Firefox @ 2013-07-09 13:37 aurfalien 2013-07-09 13:54 ` Eric Sandeen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: aurfalien @ 2013-07-09 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xfs Hi all, Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? - aurf _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: inode64 and Firefox 2013-07-09 13:37 inode64 and Firefox aurfalien @ 2013-07-09 13:54 ` Eric Sandeen 2013-07-09 14:08 ` aurfalien 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-07-09 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: aurfalien; +Cc: xfs On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote: > Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox? However, this isn't encouraging: $ file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped $ ./summarise_stat.pl /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox 1 100.0% use 32-bit stat() family interfaces only sooo if my perl script is to be believed, it may be problematic, depending on how serious a stat() failure is. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: inode64 and Firefox 2013-07-09 13:54 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2013-07-09 14:08 ` aurfalien 2013-07-09 14:09 ` Eric Sandeen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: aurfalien @ 2013-07-09 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote: >> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? > > I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox? Its 32 bit FF. Thunderbird also has issues. Too bad :( Stuck in the stone age. Got a 24TB fs functioning as a home dir for ~100 pplz that I would like to modernize. > However, this isn't encouraging: > > $ file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox > /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped > > $ ./summarise_stat.pl /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox > 1 100.0% use 32-bit stat() family interfaces only > > sooo if my perl script is to be believed, it may be problematic, depending on how serious a stat() failure is. > > -Eric Thanks for the feedback. - aurf _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: inode64 and Firefox 2013-07-09 14:08 ` aurfalien @ 2013-07-09 14:09 ` Eric Sandeen 2013-07-09 14:35 ` Stan Hoeppner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2013-07-09 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: aurfalien; +Cc: xfs On 7/9/13 9:08 AM, aurfalien wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote: >>> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? >> >> I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox? > > Its 32 bit FF. Thunderbird also has issues. Too bad :( Ok, below was for 64-bit, even! I'd file a bug w/ them, it can't be that hard to fix. Modern filesystems have 64 bit inodes, they should handle it! -Eric > Stuck in the stone age. Got a 24TB fs functioning as a home dir for ~100 pplz that I would like to modernize. > >> However, this isn't encouraging: >> >> $ file /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox >> /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped >> >> $ ./summarise_stat.pl /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox >> 1 100.0% use 32-bit stat() family interfaces only >> >> sooo if my perl script is to be believed, it may be problematic, depending on how serious a stat() failure is. >> >> -Eric > > Thanks for the feedback. > > - aurf > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: inode64 and Firefox 2013-07-09 14:09 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2013-07-09 14:35 ` Stan Hoeppner 2013-07-09 14:54 ` aurfalien 2013-07-10 3:42 ` inode64 and Firefox - update aurfalien 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Stan Hoeppner @ 2013-07-09 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs, aurfalien On 7/9/2013 9:09 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 7/9/13 9:08 AM, aurfalien wrote: >> >> On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >>> On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote: >>>> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? >>> >>> I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox? >> >> Its 32 bit FF. Thunderbird also has issues. Too bad :( > > Ok, below was for 64-bit, even! > > I'd file a bug w/ them, it can't be that hard to fix. Modern filesystems have 64 bit inodes, they should handle it! > > -Eric > >> Stuck in the stone age. Got a 24TB fs functioning as a home dir for ~100 pplz that I would like to modernize. Is XFS being mounted via NFS or Samba? Do your server and client versions of these support 64 bit inodes? If these are 32 bit Windows clients I think it's pretty certain they don't/can't handle 64 bit inodes. Thus this may not be strictly a FF/TB problem. We need more information. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: inode64 and Firefox 2013-07-09 14:35 ` Stan Hoeppner @ 2013-07-09 14:54 ` aurfalien 2013-07-10 3:42 ` inode64 and Firefox - update aurfalien 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: aurfalien @ 2013-07-09 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stan; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, xfs On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 7/9/2013 9:09 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 7/9/13 9:08 AM, aurfalien wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote: >>>>> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? >>>> >>>> I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox? >>> >>> Its 32 bit FF. Thunderbird also has issues. Too bad :( >> >> Ok, below was for 64-bit, even! >> >> I'd file a bug w/ them, it can't be that hard to fix. Modern filesystems have 64 bit inodes, they should handle it! >> >> -Eric >> >>> Stuck in the stone age. Got a 24TB fs functioning as a home dir for ~100 pplz that I would like to modernize. > > Is XFS being mounted via NFS or Samba? NFS > Do your server and client > versions of these support 64 bit inodes? Yes, everything works except for Mozilla warez. I'm seeing if there are any KDE issues as well. > If these are 32 bit Windows > clients I think it's pretty certain they don't/can't handle 64 bit > inodes. Thus this may not be strictly a FF/TB problem. We need more > information. > My OS's both actual and virtual are 64 bit. Lin64 and Win64. - aurf _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: inode64 and Firefox - update 2013-07-09 14:35 ` Stan Hoeppner 2013-07-09 14:54 ` aurfalien @ 2013-07-10 3:42 ` aurfalien 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: aurfalien @ 2013-07-10 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stan; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, xfs On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 7/9/2013 9:09 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 7/9/13 9:08 AM, aurfalien wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote: >>>>> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? >>>> >>>> I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox? >>> >>> Its 32 bit FF. Thunderbird also has issues. Too bad :( >> >> Ok, below was for 64-bit, even! >> >> I'd file a bug w/ them, it can't be that hard to fix. Modern filesystems have 64 bit inodes, they should handle it! >> >> -Eric >> >>> Stuck in the stone age. Got a 24TB fs functioning as a home dir for ~100 pplz that I would like to modernize. > > Is XFS being mounted via NFS or Samba? Do your server and client > versions of these support 64 bit inodes? If these are 32 bit Windows > clients I think it's pretty certain they don't/can't handle 64 bit > inodes. Thus this may not be strictly a FF/TB problem. We need more > information. > > -- > Stan UPDATE Latest 64 bit Firefox/Thunderflop work just fine via inode64. Testing other apps but so far so good. Some plugins may be an issue but those may as well be local. - aurf _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-10 3:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-07-09 13:37 inode64 and Firefox aurfalien 2013-07-09 13:54 ` Eric Sandeen 2013-07-09 14:08 ` aurfalien 2013-07-09 14:09 ` Eric Sandeen 2013-07-09 14:35 ` Stan Hoeppner 2013-07-09 14:54 ` aurfalien 2013-07-10 3:42 ` inode64 and Firefox - update aurfalien
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox