From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF427F37 for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:35:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BB630405F for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 07:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id OEhiJIFHZwf9OD8x for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 07:35:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51DC1FB4.7010108@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:35:32 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: inode64 and Firefox References: <51DC1600.7080906@sandeen.net> <51DC198C.70106@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <51DC198C.70106@sandeen.net> Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, aurfalien On 7/9/2013 9:09 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 7/9/13 9:08 AM, aurfalien wrote: >> >> On Jul 9, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >>> On 7/9/13 8:37 AM, aurfalien wrote: >>>> Before I dig deeper, wondering if any one has issues running Firefox v22 from an XFS file system mounted using inode64 option? >>> >>> I've not tried it, but first question - 32-bit or 64-bit firefox? >> >> Its 32 bit FF. Thunderbird also has issues. Too bad :( > > Ok, below was for 64-bit, even! > > I'd file a bug w/ them, it can't be that hard to fix. Modern filesystems have 64 bit inodes, they should handle it! > > -Eric > >> Stuck in the stone age. Got a 24TB fs functioning as a home dir for ~100 pplz that I would like to modernize. Is XFS being mounted via NFS or Samba? Do your server and client versions of these support 64 bit inodes? If these are 32 bit Windows clients I think it's pretty certain they don't/can't handle 64 bit inodes. Thus this may not be strictly a FF/TB problem. We need more information. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs