From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4F27F5F for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:04:10 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <520415D2.1090108@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:04:02 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/49] libxfs: sync dir2 kernel differences References: <1374216324-8781-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1374216324-8781-11-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1374216324-8781-11-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 07/19/13 01:44, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- > diff --git a/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c b/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c > index bdce1b3..222f08c 100644 > --- a/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c > +++ b/libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c 9th chunk in libxfs/xfs_dir2_node.c patch > @@ -1795,9 +1793,9 @@ xfs_dir2_node_addname_int( > /* > * Look at the current free entry. Is it good enough? > * > - * The bests initialisation should be wher eteh bufer is read in > + * The bests initialisation should be where the bufer is read in > * the above branch. But gcc is too stupid to realise that bests > - * iand the freehdr are actually initialised if they are placed > + * and the freehdr are actually initialised if they are placed > * there, so we have to do it here to avoid warnings. Blech. > */ > bests = xfs_dir3_free_bests_p(mp, free); A clean up in the xfsprogs master branch requires this to be removed. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs