From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993567F6A for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:03:07 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3393BAC005 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6NgDuWJsGVE4KoMv for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5208EB12.3040608@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:02:58 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfs_repair segfaulting in phase 3 References: In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Yves Brueckner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 8/12/13 6:38 AM, Jan Yves Brueckner wrote: > Hi there, > > as in previous posts we've got a problem in repair/dir2.c after a > xfs_repair -L -m 60000 segfaulting reproducibly at the very same > point of recovery; > > I did the initial repair with debianish 2.9.8 (some patches applied); > then upgrading to latest stable 3.1.11 where the problem persists. > > 3.1.11 when compiled w/o optimization and run with gdb however > segfaulted in libpthread so I repeated with an -O0 of 2.9.8 to get > the debugging information: ... > I'll get the metadump on request. If you'd like to send it my way off-list, I'll take a look. Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs