From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4577FC3 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:46:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467A0304051 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7fNA1CuauRY5R2Ac for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5213732F.4010900@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:46:23 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add regression test for kernel bz 60673 V2 References: <1376945597-2202-1-git-send-email-jbacik@fusionio.com> <5213338D.3000205@giantdisaster.de> In-Reply-To: <5213338D.3000205@giantdisaster.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Stefan Behrens Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 8/20/13 4:14 AM, Stefan Behrens wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:53:17 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: >> There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't actually >> the same. This is a test to check this particular case where receive fails when >> it should succeed properly. I tested this to verify it fails without my fix and >> passes with my fix. Thanks, > > I tested this xfstest but for me it passes with and without the fix > ("Btrfs: check our parent dir when doing a compare send"). is there any interesting fail-ish output in $seqres.full? I wonder if it squawked about errors but exited w/ success. >> $NOT_STDOUT 2>&1 can be dangerous ... -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs