From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72A4800E for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:30:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B231E304077 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:30:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kkxdL2wWOOukFc27 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52145E6C.80404@ozlabs.org> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 14:30:04 +0800 From: Jeremy Kerr MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree References: <20130820172052.1f0d89ddf6a1a40ef70333fd@canb.auug.org.au> <20130820120702.000b044e@oracle.com> <201308202246.30869.arnd@arndb.de> <20130821010822.220f592a@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20130821010822.220f592a@oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dwight Engen Cc: cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Stephen Rothwell , Arnd Bergmann , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Ben Myers , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Gao feng , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Hi all, > Yes, I agree. The other filesystems that take an Opt_uid as well do use > current_user_ns() and not init_user_ns. They also do a uid_valid() > check and fail the mount (or fallback to GLOBAL_ROOT_UID). So I think > that would look like this: Looks good to me. Builds and mounts as expected. Acked-by: Jeremy Kerr Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs