From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FEC29DFB for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:32:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310E98F8033 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id MVSiWZKStHZrtF18 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:32:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5217E2FA.1030008@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:32:26 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Power loss and zero-length files References: <20130823152058.GR5262@sgi.com> <20130823154534.GM7153@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20130823154534.GM7153@sgi.com> Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Robert Widmer , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 8/23/2013 10:45 AM, Ben Myers wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:27:19AM -0400, Robert Widmer wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Ben Myers wrote: >> The person ran the script, unplugged the machine (instead of shutting >> it down like they were told), and boxed it up. > > lol ;) Yeah, that's pretty ignorant. Reminds me of this thread in March: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00152.html But "we" (IT industry) shot ourselves in the foot when we began using the word "appliance". No wonder then that some people literally treat them as such. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs