From: "Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 51/50] xfs: add xfs sb v4 support for dirent filetype field
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:21:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521A9173.5070502@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521993AA.7010301@gmail.com>
On 8/25/2013 1:18 AM, Michael L. Semon wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 02:19 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
>> Gents,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:14:56AM -0500, Geoffrey Wehrman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:02:26PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> | I'm very, very, very unhappy about how this situation is unfolding.
>>>
>>> As am I.
>>
>> Mark provided some mkfs code to test the v4 feature bit with, and it
>> worked fine for me.
>>
>> Given that we are protected by a feature bit, I feel that pulling in the
>> v4 feature is considerably less risky than what we did in 3.10, with
>> Dave still cleaning up his mess in -rc6, so go ahead and call me
>> reckless: I've pulled in both v4 and v5 versions of this code.
>>
>> Mark, please post your mkfs code ASAP, even though Dave hasn't reposted
>> his userspace series yet.
>>
>> Everybody gets his code in and nobody is happy.
>>
>> -Ben
>
> Mark's v4 dirent patches seem to work on 32-bit x86. I happen to agree
> 100% with Dave on this issue. However, lacking a dirent test and
> xfs_db skills, I threw everything else and the kitchen sink at
> v4-dirent XFS and did not find any evidence to back up Dave's argument.
> So I'll tip my cap to Mark for his insight on the matter, hoping that
> his testing skills are fine as always.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Michael
>
BTW, are there any xfstests results times for dirent vs. non-dirent
code? For whatever reason, generic/068 is posting noticeably worse
numbers for v4-dirent XFS than for both v4 XFS and v5-dirent CRC XFS.
I'm running the tests myself as well, but it will take a while to run
them for v4 XFS, v4-dirent XFS, v4-dirent-512b-inode XFS, and
v5-dirent-CRC XFS...which kinda speaks to Dave's point about supporting
a matrix of filesystems, but I wasn't meaning it that way...
Thanks again!
Michael
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-25 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 10:49 ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 00/50] xfs: patches for 3.12 Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 01/50] xfs: separate out log format definitions Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 02/50] xfs: split out inode log item format definition Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 03/50] xfs: split out buf log item format definitions Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 04/50] xfs: split out EFI/EFD log item format definition Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 05/50] xfs: separate dquot on disk format definitions out of xfs_quota.h Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 06/50] xfs: separate icreate log format definitions from xfs_icreate_item.h Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 07/50] xfs: split out on-disk transaction definitions Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 08/50] xfs: introduce xfs_rtalloc_defs.h Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 09/50] xfs: introduce xfs_quota_defs.h Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 10/50] xfs: sync minor header differences needed by userspace Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 11/50] xfs: split out transaction reservation code Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 12/50] xfs: move inode fork definitions to a new header file Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 13/50] xfs: move unrelated definitions out of xfs_inode.h Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 14/50] xfs: introduce xfs_inode_buf.c for inode buffer operations Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 15/50] xfs: move getdents code into it's own file Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 16/50] xfs: reshuffle dir2 definitions around for userspace Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 17/50] xfs: split out attribute listing code into separate file Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 18/50] xfs: split out attribute fork truncation " Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 19/50] xfs: split out the remote symlink handling Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 20/50] xfs: introduce xfs_sb.c for sharing with libxfs Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 21/50] xfs: create xfs_bmap_util.[ch] Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 22/50] xfs: minor cleanups Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 23/50] xfs: fix issues that cause userspace warnings Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 24/50] xfs: kill xfs_vnodeops.[ch] Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 25/50] xfs: consolidate xfs_rename.c Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 26/50] xfs: consolidate xfs_utils.c Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 27/50] xfs: consolidate extent swap code Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 28/50] xfs: don't special case shared superblock mounts Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 29/50] xfs: kill __KERNEL__ check for debug code in allocation code Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 30/50] xfs: remove __KERNEL__ from debug code Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 31/50] xfs: remove __KERNEL__ check from xfs_dir2_leaf.c Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 32/50] xfs: xfs_filestreams.h doesn't need __KERNEL__ Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 33/50] xfs: move kernel specific type definitions to xfs.h Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 34/50] xfs: make struct xfs_perag kernel only Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 35/50] xfs: Introduce a new structure to hold transaction reservation items Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 36/50] xfs: Introduce tr_fsyncts to m_reservation Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 37/50] xfs: Make writeid transaction use tr_writeid Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:49 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 38/50] xfs: refactor xfs_trans_reserve() interface Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 39/50] xfs: Get rid of all XFS_XXX_LOG_RES() macro Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 40/50] xfs: Refactor xfs_ticket_alloc() to extract a new helper Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 41/50] xfs: Add xfs_log_rlimit.c Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 42/50] xfs: Validate log space at mount time Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 18:46 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 43/50] xfs: return log item size in IOP_SIZE Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 44/50] xfs: Reduce allocations during CIL insertion Dave Chinner
2013-08-13 13:28 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 45/50] xfs: avoid CIL allocation during insert Dave Chinner
2013-08-13 13:37 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 46/50] xfs: Combine CIL insert and prepare passes Dave Chinner
2013-08-13 14:02 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 47/50] xfs: split the CIL lock Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 48/50] xfs: Add read-only support for dirent filetype field Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 49/50] xfs: Add write " Dave Chinner
2013-08-12 10:50 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 50/50] xfs: use reference counts to free clean buffer items Dave Chinner
2013-08-13 15:03 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-13 21:46 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-13 22:00 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-14 3:57 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-14 4:12 ` Zhi Yong Wu
2013-08-14 6:41 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-14 13:26 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-14 17:49 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-15 0:48 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-15 21:43 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** " Ben Myers
2013-08-12 22:55 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 00/50] xfs: patches for 3.12 Ben Myers
2013-08-13 21:28 ` Ben Myers
2013-08-19 20:19 ` [PATCH 51/50] xfs: add xfs sb v4 support for dirent filetype field Mark Tinguely
2013-08-19 23:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-20 14:29 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-20 14:45 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-20 18:50 ` Ben Myers
2013-08-20 21:00 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-20 21:05 ` Ben Myers
2013-08-20 23:19 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-21 0:06 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-21 17:03 ` Ben Myers
2013-08-22 2:02 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-22 16:14 ` Geoffrey Wehrman
2013-08-22 18:19 ` Ben Myers
2013-08-25 5:18 ` Michael L. Semon
2013-08-25 23:21 ` Michael L. Semon [this message]
2013-08-26 15:40 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-19 23:40 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-20 19:57 ` Geoffrey Wehrman
2013-08-22 15:59 ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** [PATCH 00/50] xfs: patches for 3.12 Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521A9173.5070502@gmail.com \
--to=mlsemon35@gmail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox