From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:04:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521CA3F8.7070805@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521BC64A.6040005@sgi.com>
On 08/26/13 16:19, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 08/26/13 16:04, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:00:24AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>>> On 08/26/13 08:36, Brian Foster wrote:
>>>> On 08/26/2013 12:13 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 02:28:00PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hit an assert on a debug kernel while beating on some finobt
>>>>>> work and
>>>>>> eventually reproduced it on unmodified/TOT xfs/xfsprogs as of
>>>>>> today. I
>>>>>> hit it through a couple different paths, first while running
>>>>>> fsstress on
>>>>>> a CRC enabled filesystem (with otherwise default mkfs options):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (These tests are running on a 4p, 4GB VM against a 100GB virtio disk,
>>>>>> hosted on a single spindle desktop box).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> crc=1
>>>>>> fsstress -z -fsymlink=1 -n99999999 -p4 -d /mnt/test
>>>>>>
>>>>>> XFS: Assertion failed: first<= last&& last< BBTOB(bp->b_length),
>>>>>
>>>>> Directory buffer overrun.
> A full test still asserts on the remove with the patched Linux 3.10 - I
> am about 50% into the retest of Linux 3.10 and then I was planning to
> move back to Linux 3.9.
>
> kdump did not work, so I have no vmcore and therefore no productive
> information.
>
Confirmed the Linux 3.10 asserts. Linux 3.9 does not assert.
I will fix the kdump and try to catch a Linux 3.10 assert.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-27 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 18:28 XFS: Assertion failed: first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length), file: fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c, line: 568 Brian Foster
2013-08-23 13:18 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-23 13:30 ` Brian Foster
2013-08-23 13:57 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-23 16:49 ` Brian Foster
2013-08-23 18:01 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH] " Dave Chinner
2013-08-26 13:36 ` Brian Foster
2013-08-26 15:00 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-26 21:04 ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-26 21:19 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-27 13:04 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
2013-08-26 20:26 ` Michael L. Semon
2013-08-29 12:37 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-08-30 14:56 ` Ben Myers
2013-09-12 23:51 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-09-16 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-09-16 17:30 ` Mark Tinguely
2013-09-16 17:41 ` Michael L. Semon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521CA3F8.7070805@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox