From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4BA7CBF for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:46:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C1BAC008 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kQalLikTfqYEmiF7 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <521CD7FC.1080706@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:46:52 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: generic/255: Execute only if blocksize <= 4096 References: <2909046.09LYLQvZ6q@localhost.localdomain> <44437668.FEX1DiRokR@localhost.localdomain> <521B664B.7030404@redhat.com> <3942763.p7a9her5Nt@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <3942763.p7a9her5Nt@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: chandan Cc: Eric Sandeen , sekharan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 8/27/13 7:16 AM, chandan wrote: > On Monday, August 26, 2013 09:29:31 AM Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >> Just as a sanity check, does it also fail on xfs for 64k block sizes on ppc64? >> > > Yes, it does fail as shown below: > (removing linux-btrfs for now): Hohum, I get failures on 2k and even 4k blocksize xfs (and ext4) on ppc64 as well. (this was on a 3.10 kernel) Have you seen this? I guess I'm a little reluctant to restrict the test to <=4k until we understand what all the issues are and at least see it passing on the smaller block sizes... do they work for you? -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs