From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287A17F3F for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:21:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4899AC00A for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 05:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CVI4AVfhjBGzDd85 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 05:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acsinet21.oracle.com (acsinet21.oracle.com [141.146.126.237]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r7UCLCd9016626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:21:13 GMT Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by acsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7UCLBJU019550 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:21:12 GMT Received: from abhmt117.oracle.com (abhmt117.oracle.com [141.146.116.69]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7UCLBWr019546 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:21:11 GMT Message-ID: <52208DC0.2030805@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:19:12 +0400 From: Vasily Isaenko MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: SGID inheritance in different file-systems List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Dear XFS Members, In the XFS test suite there is a test case generic/314 "Test SGID inheritance on subdirectories". It is not specific to a particular filesystem thus selected for both xfs or ext4 test runs. In other words, the same behaviour is expected and enforced for XFS and EXT4. However, I have been told that EXT4 and XFS may have different behaviour as the setgid-directory behavior is not guaranteed to work the same way on all filesystems. Shall XFS test case reflect that difference or enforcing the same behaviour is appropriate? Best regards, Vasily _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs