From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D817F4E for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 10:25:37 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5228A26E.1040202@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:25:34 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/55] xfsprogs: port inode create transaction changes References: <1378332359-14737-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1378332359-14737-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1378332359-14737-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 09/04/13 17:05, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Bring across the relevant parts of the new inode create transaction > sufficient to keep kernel/user code in sync and implement the > infrastructure needed to make it work in xfsprogs. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- Same as previous posting. I said in the last patch posting that this had "parts of kernel commits 28c8e41a, ddf6ad01, b8402b47?, and b8402b47". I did not thoroughly review the previous posting of this patch, so I am looking at it closer now. There arguement difference in xfs_ialloc_get_rec() from Linux 3.11, but that is needed for patch 11. Still looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs