From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32CC7F59 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 10:46:58 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5228A771.2090809@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 10:46:57 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/55] libxfs: sync xfs_da_btree.c References: <1378332359-14737-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1378332359-14737-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> In-Reply-To: <1378332359-14737-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 09/04/13 17:05, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Some variables we renamed in the kernel code, and there are a few > other minor differences. Fix them up. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner > --- Patch has not changed since last posting. My review back then was [] is added to make sense of the comments: okay, only difference [between the kernel/user source files] is the initializing of the pagb_tree in xfs_alloc_read_agf() [it is not in the xfsprogs]. [Okay, because we] Don't use the busy extent tree in user space. Still looks good. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs