From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8DE7F63 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:11:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28B730404E for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5238C575.4000900@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:11:17 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: check for valid input to _scratch_mkfs_sized References: <5238ADE1.5050204@redhat.com> <5238BE63.8000405@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <5238BE63.8000405@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: xfs-oss On 9/17/13 3:41 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote: > On 09/17/13 14:30, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> _scratch_mkfs_sized requires an integer number of bytes >> as input; if it's given something else, catch it and _notrun. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen >> --- > > Ah, the "don't do what Mark did" patch. the "make life easier for future Marks" patch. ;) > Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely Thanks! _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs