From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A94A7F50 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:14:23 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5238D43B.5010808@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:14:19 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: v2 xfs directory unbalance assert test References: <20130917192538.230164044@sgi.com> <20130917213409.GL19103@dastard> <5238CB32.2090404@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <5238CB32.2090404@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 09/17/13 16:35, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 9/17/13 4:34 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 02:25:23PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >>> This tests triggers an assert in the XFS directory unbalance code. >>> This test originally written by Brian Foster and suggestions >>> from Micheal Semon. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely >>> --- >>> v1->v2: >>> remove clean up. >>> remove $seqres.full before test. >>> remove scratch mount. >>> 11g -> calculate 11g bytes. >>> check for failing mkfs and mount. >>> add a safer removal of the scratch files. >>> >>> put into auto group and "long" group so people can opt out: >>> this test almost an hour on my test box. >> >> 45m is too long for the auto group. The entire auto group runs in >> 50-55 minutes on my test VMs, so doubling that for one test is not >> really a good idea. > > Ok, sorry, my fault. Fix on commit? > > -Eric We can't remove much more and still hit the assert, so I am happy to remove it from the auto group. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs