From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: push down inactive transaction mgmt for remote symlinks
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:06:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5239EBA2.4070207@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379520960-22972-2-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com>
On 09/18/2013 12:15 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> Push down the transaction management for remote symlinks from
> xfs_inactive() down to xfs_inactive_symlink_rmt(). The latter is
> cleaned up to avoid transaction management intended for the
> calling context (i.e., trans duplication, reservation, item
> attachment).
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 15 ++++++------
> fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
...
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c
> index f622a97..f85f6f2 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.c
> @@ -424,8 +424,7 @@ xfs_symlink(
> */
...
>
> @@ -563,16 +546,13 @@ xfs_inactive_symlink_rmt(
> */
> int
> xfs_inactive_symlink(
> - struct xfs_inode *ip,
> - struct xfs_trans **tp)
> + struct xfs_inode *ip)
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> int pathlen;
>
> trace_xfs_inactive_symlink(ip);
>
> - ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
> -
I just want to call out one thing here in case it isn't noticed on
review... the safety of this is something I was curious about.
Specifically, note that I've removed the inode locking from
xfs_inactive(), which previously covered xfs_inactive_symlink() (for
xfs_idata_realloc()), down into xfs_inactive_symlink_rmt().
My assumption was that this is currently ok since at this point we have
an inode with di_nlink == 0. If that's not accurate or not expected to
remain so after O_TMPFILE related work, I suppose I could pull the
locking back up into xfs_inactive_symlink().
Brian
> if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
> return XFS_ERROR(EIO);
>
> @@ -599,5 +579,5 @@ xfs_inactive_symlink(
> }
>
> /* remove the remote symlink */
> - return xfs_inactive_symlink_rmt(ip, tp);
> + return xfs_inactive_symlink_rmt(ip);
> }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h
> index 99338ba..e75245d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_symlink.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,6 @@
> int xfs_symlink(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct xfs_name *link_name,
> const char *target_path, umode_t mode, struct xfs_inode **ipp);
> int xfs_readlink(struct xfs_inode *ip, char *link);
> -int xfs_inactive_symlink(struct xfs_inode *ip, struct xfs_trans **tpp);
> +int xfs_inactive_symlink(struct xfs_inode *ip);
>
> #endif /* __XFS_SYMLINK_H */
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-18 18:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-18 16:15 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: rework xfs_inactive() Brian Foster
2013-09-18 16:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: push down inactive transaction mgmt for remote symlinks Brian Foster
2013-09-18 18:06 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2013-09-18 22:51 ` Dave Chinner
2013-09-19 12:43 ` Brian Foster
2013-09-19 23:23 ` Dave Chinner
2013-09-18 22:17 ` Dave Chinner
2013-09-19 12:55 ` Brian Foster
2013-09-20 13:05 ` Brian Foster
2013-09-18 16:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: push down inactive transaction mgmt for truncate Brian Foster
2013-09-18 23:00 ` Dave Chinner
2013-09-18 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: push down inactive transaction mgmt for ifree Brian Foster
2013-09-18 23:06 ` Dave Chinner
2013-09-19 12:44 ` Brian Foster
2013-09-19 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5239EBA2.4070207@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox