From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0943E29E11 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:35:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B1E304032 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id IoiUMWVfRQ55k8gt for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <523A1CA6.3020302@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:35:34 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfsprogs: update version for 3.2.0-alpha1 References: <20130916205637.GD1935@sgi.com> <20130916223855.GF19103@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20130916223855.GF19103@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Ben Myers , rjohnston@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 9/16/13 5:38 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:56:37PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: >> xfsprogs: update version for 3.2.0-alpha1 > > I'd say this is a major feature and infrastructure > update across the entire xfsprogs package, and in that case a > PKG_MAJOR bump is warranted, not PKG_MINOR. > > i.e. We're shooting for a 4.0 release, not 3.2... Yeah good point. I'm fine with 4.0. It smells like Progress! ;) Dave also pointed out offline that maybe a 3.99 might be easier on some package managers; for Fedora it's no problem, I can just do some sort of 4.0-0.1.alpha1 4.0-0.2.alpha2 4.0-0.3.alpha3 4.0-0.4.rc1 ... 4.0-1 type progression. But if people like 3.99 *shrug* let's not paint this bike shed too many times. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs