public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix the extent count when allocating an new indirection array entry
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:38:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <524292E3.4010902@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130923002448.GL12541@dastard>

On 09/23/2013 08:24 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 10:38:31PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
>> From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>>
>> At xfs_iext_add(), if extent(s) are being appended to the last
>> page in the indirection array and the new extent(s) don't fit
>> in the page, the number of extents(erp->er_extcount) in a new
>> allocated entry should be the minimum value between count and
>> XFS_LINEAR_EXTS, instead of count.
> 
> Definitely looks like a bug, but what are the symptoms of it and how
> did you find the problem? Is there any test case that demonstrates a
> problem with the er_extcount being set incorrectly here?

Sorry for the too late response, I found this problem while reading the code.
However, I can not figure out a test case to break the kernel until now. :(

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/xfs/xfs_inode_fork.c |    8 ++++----
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_fork.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_fork.c
>> index 02f1083..dfb4226 100644
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_fork.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode_fork.c
>> @@ -1035,11 +1035,11 @@ xfs_iext_add(
>>  
>>  			while (count) {
>>  				erp = xfs_iext_irec_new(ifp, erp_idx);
>> -				erp->er_extcount = count;
>> -				count -= MIN(count, (int)XFS_LINEAR_EXTS);
>> -				if (count) {
>> +				erp->er_extcount = MIN(count,
>> +						       (int)XFS_LINEAR_EXTS);
>> +				count -= erp->er_extcount;
> 
> count is declared as an int, whereas XFS_LINEAR_EXTS probably ends
> up with a type of uint because of a cast in the macro. because we
> are decrementing to zero, the count can be declared as a uint, too,
> and the cast in the MIN() can go away. Indeed, MIN() should be
> converted to min() seeing as we are touching the code here, and if
> you want to retain the current types, the min_t() is appropriate,
> not min(x, (some cast)y)....

Ok, will fix it.

Thanks,
-Jeff

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2013-09-25  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-21 14:38 [PATCH] xfs: fix the extent count when allocating an new indirection array entry Jeff Liu
2013-09-23  0:24 ` Dave Chinner
2013-09-25  7:38   ` Jeff Liu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=524292E3.4010902@oracle.com \
    --to=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox