From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xfstests: add filter to 200 accommodate changed mount output
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 16:28:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5251D5E1.3020202@redhat.com> (raw)
The mount binary changed its output w.r.t. red-only devices, and
stopped referring to a "block device."
This broke at least test xfs/200; add a common filter to remove
the "block device" from older mount binary output, and change
the 200.out file to match.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter
index ee738ca..066b353 100644
--- a/common/filter
+++ b/common/filter
@@ -280,5 +280,12 @@ _filter_size_to_bytes()
echo $((${size:0:${#size}-1}*$mul))
}
+# Older mount output referred to "block device" when mounting RO devices
+# It's gone in newer versions
+_filter_ro_mount() {
+ sed -e "s/mount: block device//g" \
+ -e "s/mount: cannot mount block device/mount: cannot mount/g"
+}
+
# make sure this script returns success
/bin/true
diff --git a/tests/xfs/200 b/tests/xfs/200
index a3b7274..f573481 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/200
+++ b/tests/xfs/200
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ blockdev --setro $SCRATCH_DEV
# -o norecovery is used.
#
echo "mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device:"
-_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
+_scratch_mount 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount
echo "unmounting read-only filesystem"
umount $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ umount $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
# data recovery hack.
#
echo "mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device:"
-_scratch_mount -o norecovery 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
+_scratch_mount -o norecovery 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | _filter_ro_mount
echo "unmounting read-only filesystem"
umount $SCRATCH_MNT 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ blockdev --setrw $SCRATCH_DEV
# the underlying device is not write protected.
#
echo "mounting filesystem that needs recovery with -o ro:"
-_scratch_mount -o ro 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
+_scratch_mount -o ro 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
# success, all done
echo "*** done"
diff --git a/tests/xfs/200.out b/tests/xfs/200.out
index 174838c..40f9163 100644
--- a/tests/xfs/200.out
+++ b/tests/xfs/200.out
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
QA output created by 200
setting device read-only
mounting read-only block device:
-mount: block device SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only
+mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only
touching file on read-only filesystem (should fail)
touch: cannot touch 'SCRATCH_MNT/foo': Read-only file system
unmounting read-only filesystem
@@ -12,12 +12,12 @@ going down:
unmounting shutdown filesystem:
setting device read-only
mounting filesystem that needs recovery on a read-only device:
-mount: block device SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only
-mount: cannot mount block device SCRATCH_DEV read-only
+mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only
+mount: cannot mount SCRATCH_DEV read-only
unmounting read-only filesystem
umount: SCRATCH_MNT: not mounted
mounting filesystem with -o norecovery on a read-only device:
-mount: block device SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only
+mount: SCRATCH_DEV is write-protected, mounting read-only
unmounting read-only filesystem
setting device read-write
mounting filesystem that needs recovery with -o ro:
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-06 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-06 21:28 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-10-09 21:42 ` [PATCH] xfstests: add filter to 200 accommodate changed mount output Dave Chinner
2013-10-16 20:31 ` Rich Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5251D5E1.3020202@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox