From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [bisected] xfs_repair refuses to run on cleanly mountable partition
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:12:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5252EB6F.5050502@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131007165217.GF280@x4>
On 10/7/13 11:52 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2013.10.07 at 10:54 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 10/7/13 10:40 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>>> On 2013.10.07 at 10:36 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> On 10/7/13 10:29 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>>>>> On 2013.10.07 at 10:21 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/7/13 10:16 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>>>>>>> x4 ~ # xfs_repair -V
>>>>>>> xfs_repair version 3.2.0-alpha1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> x4 ~ # mount -o logbsize=256k /dev/sdc1 /mnt
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> [ 6419.592649] XFS (sdc1): Mounting Filesystem
>>>>>>> [ 6419.642480] XFS (sdc1): Ending clean mount
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> x4 ~ # xfs_info /dev/sdc1
>>>>>>> meta-data=/dev/sdc1 isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=61047552 blks
>>>>>>> = sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=0
>>>>>>> = crc=0
>>>>>>> data = bsize=4096 blocks=244190208, imaxpct=25
>>>>>>> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
>>>>>>> naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
>>>>>>> log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=119233, version=2
>>>>>>> = sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
>>>>>>> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> x4 ~ # umount /mnt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> x4 ~ # xfs_repair /dev/sdc1
>>>>>>> Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
>>>>>>> Phase 2 - using internal log
>>>>>>> - zero log...
>>>>>>> ERROR: The filesystem has valuable metadata changes in a log which needs to
>>>>>>> be replayed. Mount the filesystem to replay the log, and unmount it before
>>>>>>> re-running xfs_repair. If you are unable to mount the filesystem, then use
>>>>>>> the -L option to destroy the log and attempt a repair.
>>>>>>> Note that destroying the log may cause corruption -- please attempt a mount
>>>>>>> of the filesystem before doing this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What kernel are you running? Does older xfs_repair behave differently?
>>>>>> (use xfs_repair -n if you test an old xfsprogs, to preserve this state
>>>>>> for debugging...)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm running the latest git kernel 3.12.0-rc4.
>>>>> "xfs_repair -n" runs fine even with xfsprogs 3.2.0-alpha1...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps copying out or dumping the log w/ xfs_logprint would also help,
>>>>>> maybe start with:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # xfs_logprint -t /dev/sdc1
>>>>> xfs_logprint:
>>>>> data device: 0x821
>>>>> log device: 0x821 daddr: 976760888 length: 953864
>>>>>
>>>>> log tail: 53376 head: 53376 state: <CLEAN>
>>>>
>>>> Funky.
>>>>
>>>> How about an xfs_repair -v (for verbose).
>>> ...
>>> - zero log..
>>> zero_log: head block 53048 tail block 49064
>>> ERROR: The filesystem has valuable metadata changes in a log which needs to
>>> ...
>>>
>>
>> Very strange. Both xfs_logprint & xfs_repair should be using the same
>> function in libxfs for finding the head & tail.
>>
>> I asked off-list if you wanted to provide a metadump image I could look
>> at directly...
>
> I've bisected this issue to the following commit from Dave:
>
> commit e0607266f23f82226f8aee502552d6ce25c4e6a5
> Author: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri Jun 7 10:25:47 2013 +1000
>
> xfsprogs: add crc format support to repair
>
>
Cool, thanks.
That commit added:
diff --git a/repair/phase2.c b/repair/phase2.c
index 2817fed..a62854e 100644
--- a/repair/phase2.c
+++ b/repair/phase2.c
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ zero_log(xfs_mount_t *mp)
ASSERT(mp->m_sb.sb_logsectlog >= BBSHIFT);
}
log.l_sectbb_mask = (1 << log.l_sectbb_log) - 1;
+ log.l_sectBBsize = 1 << mp->m_sb.sb_logsectlog;
if ((error = xlog_find_tail(&log, &head_blk, &tail_blk))) {
do_warn(_("zero_log: cannot find log head/tail "
right before the call to xlog_find_tail, which is what found the dirty log.
those various things are:
__uint8_t sb_logsectlog; /* log2 of the log sector size */
uint l_sectbb_log; /* log2 of sector size in bbs */
int l_sectBBsize; /* size of log sector in 512 byte chunks */
The hunk above sticks out as odd, because it was already set a different way about
12 lines prior:
log.l_sectBBsize = BTOBB(x.lbsize);
And "indeed" as Dave might say, ;) - l_sectBBsize is supposed to be in
512-byte units (i.e. 1 for 512, 8 for 4k), but it's coming out as 4096
because it's taking sb_logsectlog - describing byte units - and using it to get
something in sector units.
It still accidentally works for 512-byte sectors, because in in that case we set
sb_logsectlog to 0 (not 9, because - sure, why not!):
if (lsectorsize != BBSIZE || sectorsize != BBSIZE) {
sbp->sb_logsectlog = (__uint8_t)lsectorlog;
sbp->sb_logsectsize = (__uint16_t)lsectorsize;
} else {
sbp->sb_logsectlog = 0;
sbp->sb_logsectsize = 0;
}
Anyway:
I bet if you remove "log.l_sectBBsize = 1 << mp->m_sb.sb_logsectlog;" from
around line 67 it'll fix it.
Want to try it? Sorry for abusing your bandwidth in the meantime. :)
If it works I'll send the patch.
Thanks,
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-07 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-07 15:16 xfs_repair refuses to run on cleanly mountable partition Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-10-07 15:21 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-07 15:29 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-10-07 15:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-07 15:40 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-10-07 15:54 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-07 16:52 ` [bisected] " Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-10-07 17:12 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-10-07 17:25 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5252EB6F.5050502@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox