From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F7E7F58 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 19:57:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5678AC002 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sQWYcSNXfuODKgdy for ; Mon, 07 Oct 2013 17:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52535864.8020503@sandeen.net> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 19:57:08 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore References: <524AF8AE.5030300@sgi.com> <20131007193912.256265551@sgi.com> <20131008005317.GU4446@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20131008005317.GU4446@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: rjohnston@sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 10/7/13 7:53 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > Two tests, please. move all the common parts into common/dump, and > write them as two separate tests. That way we can easily track what > test is failing just by looking at what harness test is failing... I'm not quite convinced that it's 2 separate tests, TBH. It's the same root cause; I guess there is a slightly different outcome because if you hit the same root cause enough times, you'll segfault. That's the only difference in test #2. (and the segfault isn't fixed AFAIK). -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs