public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:21:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <525414D9.10308@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52535864.8020503@sandeen.net>

On 10/07/2013 07:57 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 10/7/13 7:53 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> Two tests, please. move all the common parts into common/dump, and
>> write them as two separate tests. That way we can easily track what
>> test is failing just by looking at what harness test is failing...
>
> I'm not quite convinced that it's 2 separate tests, TBH.
>
> It's the same root cause; I guess there is a slightly different
> outcome because if you hit the same root cause enough times,
> you'll segfault.


Multiple DMF offline files are successfully restored but the attrs are 
lost. I wanted to show/test that case.

I agree with Eric that it is the same  root cause but because can occur 
with successful dumps and does not segfault,  Thats why the 2 tests.

> That's the only difference in test #2.
> (and the segfault isn't fixed AFAIK).

Agreed and I will note that in the test description.

>
> -Eric
>

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-08 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-01 16:30 [PATCH] xfsrestore: fix multi stream support Rich Johnston
2013-10-01 20:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-01 21:39   ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-01 22:02     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-02  3:57       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02  4:17         ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02  4:26       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02 18:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-02 20:03   ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-02 20:13     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-03 13:40       ` Rich Johnston
     [not found] ` <20131003212114.493910914@sgi.com>
2013-10-03 22:11   ` [PATCH] xfsdump: handle large, wholly-sparse files Eric Sandeen
2013-10-03 23:11 ` [PATCH V2] " Rich Johnston
2013-10-03 23:16   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-07 19:38 ` [PATCH] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore rjohnston
2013-10-07 20:32   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-07 20:54     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-07 21:00       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08  0:53   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-08  0:57     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08  0:58       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08 14:21       ` Rich Johnston [this message]
2013-10-08 19:27         ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-08 19:57           ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-08  1:08   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-08 14:22     ` Rich Johnston
2013-10-08 14:43 ` [PATCH V2] xfstests XFS: verify extended attributes after multi-stream xfsdump/xfsrestore are not lost rjohnston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=525414D9.10308@sgi.com \
    --to=rjohnston@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox