public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: remove newlines from 3 xfs_alert_tag error strings
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 20:45:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5258A9C9.1040208@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525874AA.9020300@sgi.com>

On 10/11/13 4:59 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 10/11/13 14:09, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> xfs_alert_tag passes the format string to __xfs_printk,
>> which adds its own "\n".  Having it in the original string
>> leads to unintentional blank lines from these messages.
>>
>> Most format strings have no newline, but these 3 do, leading to
>> i.e.:
>>
>> [ 7347.119911] XFS (sdb2): Access to block zero in inode 132 start_block: 0 start_off: 0 blkcnt: 0 extent-state: 0 lastx: 1a05
>> [ 7347.119911]
>> [ 7347.119919] XFS (sdb2): Access to block zero in inode 132 start_block: 0 start_off: 0 blkcnt: 0 extent-state: 0 lastx: 1a05
>> [ 7347.119919]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen<sandeen@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino<cmaiolino@redhat.com>
>> ---
> 
> Is this true of xfs_alert() too? ie the newline in xfs_alert in xfs_dir2_leafn_rebalance(). The newline in xfs_alert() in xlog_unpack_data_crc() looks intentional.

All of these:

define_xfs_printk_level(xfs_emerg, KERN_EMERG);
define_xfs_printk_level(xfs_alert, KERN_ALERT);
define_xfs_printk_level(xfs_crit, KERN_CRIT);
define_xfs_printk_level(xfs_err, KERN_ERR);
define_xfs_printk_level(xfs_warn, KERN_WARNING);
define_xfs_printk_level(xfs_notice, KERN_NOTICE);
define_xfs_printk_level(xfs_info, KERN_INFO);
#ifdef DEBUG
define_xfs_printk_level(xfs_debug, KERN_DEBUG);
#endif

go through __xfs_printk(), which adds a newline...

seems like more fixes are in order, yeah.

-Eric
> --Mark.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-12  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-11 19:07 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: old lost patches Eric Sandeen
2013-10-11 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: remove newlines from 3 xfs_alert_tag error strings Eric Sandeen
2013-10-11 21:59   ` Mark Tinguely
2013-10-12  1:45     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-10-12  1:59   ` [PATCH 1/4 V2] xfs: remove newlines from strings passed to __xfs_printk Eric Sandeen
2013-10-12 21:07     ` Mark Tinguely
2013-10-11 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: reject completely bogus remount options Eric Sandeen
2013-10-11 21:34   ` Mark Tinguely
2013-10-12  1:40     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-12 21:11       ` Mark Tinguely
2013-10-13 21:52   ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-14  2:42     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-14  4:45       ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-15 18:13         ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-11 19:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: don't emit corruption noise on fs probes Eric Sandeen
2013-10-11 21:21   ` Mark Tinguely
2013-10-15 19:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-11 19:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: don't break from growfs ag update loop on error Eric Sandeen
2013-10-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 0/4] xfs: old lost patches Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5258A9C9.1040208@sandeen.net \
    --to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox