From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: projid32bit=1 default in xfsprogs-3.2.0
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:57:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525DBA50.5000202@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131015214910.GX10553@sgi.com>
On 10/15/13 4:49 PM, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:31:10PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:22:14PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
>>> The tags are out there:
>>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git;a=tags
>>
>> I managed to somehow miss them. Sorry!
>
> np
>
>>> That's an interesting idea. We hadn't discussed a 3.1.12 release. No
>>> particular objection to doing that, it's just that we didn't branch for the
>>> v3.0.5->v3.1.0 set of releases. Maybe it is better if we all focus on 3.2.0.
>>
>> With git you can easily branch from a past commit, e.g.:
>>
>> hch@brick:~/work/xfsprogs$ git checkout -b release-3.1 v3.1.11
>> Switched to a new branch 'release-3.1'
>
> Yep. If folks want a 3.1.12 we should certainly kick the idea around a bit.
> I'm just guessing that most would prefer to focus on a 3.2.0 in the near term.
> Maybe I'm mistaken about that though. ;)
I'm not super keen to divide the focus; I've already updated the distros I
care about to 3.2.0-alpha1, so I wouldn't go backwards to a 3.1.12.
hch, do you have a specific need for it?
-Eric
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-14 16:30 projid32bit=1 default in xfsprogs-3.2.0 Eric Sandeen
2013-10-14 21:16 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-14 21:23 ` Ben Myers
2013-10-14 21:24 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-15 19:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-15 20:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-15 21:22 ` Ben Myers
2013-10-15 21:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-15 21:49 ` Ben Myers
2013-10-15 21:57 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-10-15 22:48 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-15 22:59 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-01-10 14:45 ` Rich Johnston
2014-01-11 10:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525DBA50.5000202@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox