From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F37F3F for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:57:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1989304032 for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id x1Fz4BjdntR8xEAG for ; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 14:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <525DBA50.5000202@sandeen.net> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:57:36 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: projid32bit=1 default in xfsprogs-3.2.0 References: <525C1C15.7020204@sandeen.net> <20131014211659.GI5663@dastard> <20131014212347.GB1935@sgi.com> <525C6108.6010108@sandeen.net> <20131015194609.GC32095@infradead.org> <20131015204342.GA24997@infradead.org> <20131015212214.GC1935@sgi.com> <20131015213110.GA5895@infradead.org> <20131015214910.GX10553@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20131015214910.GX10553@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs-oss On 10/15/13 4:49 PM, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey, > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:31:10PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 04:22:14PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote: >>> The tags are out there: >>> http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git;a=tags >> >> I managed to somehow miss them. Sorry! > > np > >>> That's an interesting idea. We hadn't discussed a 3.1.12 release. No >>> particular objection to doing that, it's just that we didn't branch for the >>> v3.0.5->v3.1.0 set of releases. Maybe it is better if we all focus on 3.2.0. >> >> With git you can easily branch from a past commit, e.g.: >> >> hch@brick:~/work/xfsprogs$ git checkout -b release-3.1 v3.1.11 >> Switched to a new branch 'release-3.1' > > Yep. If folks want a 3.1.12 we should certainly kick the idea around a bit. > I'm just guessing that most would prefer to focus on a 3.2.0 in the near term. > Maybe I'm mistaken about that though. ;) I'm not super keen to divide the focus; I've already updated the distros I care about to 3.2.0-alpha1, so I wouldn't go backwards to a 3.1.12. hch, do you have a specific need for it? -Eric > Thanks, > Ben > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs