From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: fdmanana@gmail.com
Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"dsterba@suse.cz" <dsterba@suse.cz>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add specific test for default ACL inheritance
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:19:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525EAE67.5020509@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H6N3K7wda5Rm8OYS5a0QYYQr4MbXpxCpahuXVj+dnzozA@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/16/13 10:14 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> wrote:
>> On 10/16/13 9:04 AM, Filipe David Borba Manana wrote:
>>> This test is motivated by an issue found by a btrfs user, addressed
>>> and described by the following GNU/Linux kernel patch:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3046931/
>>
>> Hi Filipe, thanks for the patch.
>>
>> Usually we don't want to add new, possibly-failing cases to old tests;
>> that makes it harder to identify when the code regressed vs. when
>> the test changed to test new things.
>>
>> It would be better to just copy the framework of tests/shared/051
>> to a new test in shared/ and test only this new inheritance
>> problem.
>
> Ok, I wasn't aware of that logic, which makes sense.
>
>>
>> Also, I'm confused about this hunk:
>>
>>> @@ -345,7 +345,12 @@ chacl $acl2 largeaclfile
>>> getfacl --numeric largeaclfile | _filter_aces
>>>
>>> echo "1 above xfs acl max"
>>> -chacl $acl3 largeaclfile
>>> +if [ "$FSTYP" != "btrfs" ]; then
>>> + chacl $acl3 largeaclfile
>>> +else
>>> + echo 'chacl: cannot set access acl on "largeaclfile": Invalid argument'
>>> +fi
>>> +
>>> getfacl --numeric largeaclfile | _filter_aces
>>>
>>> echo "use 16 aces"
>>
>> What's that about?
>
> That chacl command succeeds on btrfs, which makes the test fail. Seems
> to rely on some xfs specific limit.
> By moving this test into a new file, that hack is no longer needed.
Oh, if I'd read the context... ;)
>>> echo "1 above xfs acl max"
and:
XFS_ACL_MAX_ENTRIES=25
num_aces_pre=`expr $XFS_ACL_MAX_ENTRIES - 1`
num_aces_post=`expr $XFS_ACL_MAX_ENTRIES + 1`
acl1=`_create_n_aces $num_aces_pre`
acl2=`_create_n_aces $XFS_ACL_MAX_ENTRIES`
acl3=`_create_n_aces $num_aces_post`
Sorry for not reading more.
interesting that it's a udf test too...
Ok, but right - it's testing an xfs specific limit.
Your new test can probably be generic, with a _require_acls
to skip the test on any fs w/o acl support.
Thanks,
-Eric
> Thanks Eric.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Eric
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-16 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-16 14:04 [PATCH] xfstests: add specific test for default ACL inheritance Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-10-16 15:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-16 15:14 ` Filipe David Manana
2013-10-16 15:19 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-10-16 21:51 ` Dave Chinner
2013-10-16 15:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-10-16 16:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-16 16:11 ` Filipe David Manana
2013-10-16 16:14 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-16 16:11 ` [PATCH] " Christoph Hellwig
2013-10-16 16:25 ` [PATCH v3] " Filipe David Borba Manana
2013-10-16 16:30 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-10-16 21:24 ` Rich Johnston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525EAE67.5020509@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
--cc=jbacik@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox