From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3E67F3F for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:24:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C75304032 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:24:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id vcQsusuKdsgbdV2W for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <525EBDD1.7070107@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 11:24:49 -0500 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: xfstests names/numbers List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-oss Cc: Zach Brown Hey all (probably specifically Dave) - Is there any patch in the works to allow non-numeric test names? It'd be nice to get away from the nondescript numbers clashing. The numeric names "in service of nothing" is making Zach unhappy. And if Zach ain't happy, ain't nobody happy. ;) But seriously, I think that was in the works, or in the plan, once. Is there a patch out there somewhere? Thanks, -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs