From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F317F37 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:46:56 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <5269A35F.5080500@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:46:55 -0500 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstest: fix filtering in 206 for ftype and projid32bit References: <20131024215652.413619467@sgi.com> <20131024221136.GZ2797@dastard> In-Reply-To: <20131024221136.GZ2797@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: XFS Community On 10/24/13 17:11, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:56:42PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> xfs/206 displays the output for mkfs.xfs, xfs_growfs and xfs_info. >> Change the filtering to hide the new output for the field type >> feature. >> >> While cleaning up the ftype output, also clean up the projid32bit >> output in xfs_growfs and xfs_info. > > What about the _filter_mkfs function that other tests use? > > Cheers, > > Dave. From what I can tell, it does not need changing. --Mark. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs