From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: fix unlock in xfs_bmap_add_attrfork
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:59:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527A595B.2020201@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131106053951.GC6188@dastard>
On 11/05/13 23:39, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:27:07PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
>> xfs_trans_ijoin() activates the inode in a transaction and
>> also can specify which lock to free when the transaction is
>> committed or canceled.
>>
>> xfs_bmap_add_attrfork adds the XFS_ILOCK_EXCL flag when calling
>> xfs_trans_ijoin() so it wrong to also free this lock before doing
>> a xfs_trans_cancel. Add the unlock to the error case before the
>> xfs_trans_ijoin and remove the unlock from the error recovery.
>> While here, clean up the goto names.
>
> Definitely a bug, but I suspect it is the wrong fix. This is a
> permanent log transaction, which means there are multiple commits
> before the final commit, and xfs_trans_ijoin(XFS_ILOCK_EXCL) means
> we will unlock the inode at the first commit that is made after the
> join, not after the modifications are completed. Hence someone else
> can come in and lock and modify the inode before we've finish all
> the work in this function.
>
> Hence I suspect the right fix is to make this code use
> xfs_trans_ijoin(0) and do manual unlocking of the inode after the
> last commit/cancel is done, similar to how it is done in
> xfs_iomap_write_allocate/direct...
>
> Coupl eof other minor things:
>
>> ===================================================================
>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap.c
>> @@ -1137,9 +1137,11 @@ xfs_bmap_add_attrfork(
>> int committed; /* xaction was committed */
>> int logflags; /* logging flags */
>> int error; /* error return value */
>> + int cancel_flags;
>>
>> ASSERT(XFS_IFORK_Q(ip) == 0);
>>
>> + cancel_flags = XFS_TRANS_RELEASE_LOG_RES|XFS_TRANS_ABORT;
>> mp = ip->i_mount;
>> ASSERT(!XFS_NOT_DQATTACHED(mp, ip));
>> tp = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, XFS_TRANS_ADDAFORK);
>> @@ -1148,18 +1150,20 @@ xfs_bmap_add_attrfork(
>> tp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_RESERVE;
>> error = xfs_trans_reserve(tp,&M_RES(mp)->tr_addafork, blks, 0);
>> if (error)
>> - goto error0;
>> + goto trans_cancel;
>
> No reservation exists, so xfs_trans_cancel(tp, 0) is appropriate
> here. i.e. cancel_flags gets initialised to 0, and after we have a
> reservation we do:
nod.
> cancel_flags |= XFS_TRANS_RELEASE_LOG_RES;
>
>> xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
>> error = xfs_trans_reserve_quota_nblks(tp, ip, blks, 0, rsvd ?
>> XFS_QMOPT_RES_REGBLKS | XFS_QMOPT_FORCE_RES :
>> XFS_QMOPT_RES_REGBLKS);
>> if (error) {
>> + cancel_flags = XFS_TRANS_RELEASE_LOG_RES;
>> xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
>> - xfs_trans_cancel(tp, XFS_TRANS_RELEASE_LOG_RES);
>> - return error;
>> + goto trans_cancel;
>> + }
>
> Now we potentially have dirty objects in the transaction, so
>
> cancel_flags |= XFS_TRANS_ABORT;
Okay. I will clean it up and repost.
--Mark.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 20:27 [PATCH] xfs: fix unlock in xfs_bmap_add_attrfork Mark Tinguely
2013-11-06 5:39 ` Dave Chinner
2013-11-06 14:59 ` Mark Tinguely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527A595B.2020201@sgi.com \
--to=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox