From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3D329E2B for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 12:20:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7693304043 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:20:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id z2XLJlHWjtJ2QoiP for ; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:20:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <527A887F.2030807@sandeen.net> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 12:20:47 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfstest failures References: <20131106105451.GA31283@infradead.org> <20131106161825.GU1935@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20131106161825.GU1935@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers , Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/6/13, 10:18 AM, Ben Myers wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 02:54:51AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> xfs/296 >> >> Checking for capability on restored file >> -RESTORE_DIR/DUMP_SUBDIR/testfile cap_setgid,cap_setuid+ep >> -# file: RESTORE_DIR/DUMP_SUBDIR/testfile >> -security.capability >> >> Seems like theres some issues with file capabilities. > > IIRC Eric noticed that this was broken and submitted a test for it. It would > be great if someone can work on it. ;) that's right, it's a known bug w/ a testcase but no fix yet. I looked a bit, but ugh, xfsdump. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs