From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4918C7FB7 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 07:24:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DD1AC00A for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:24:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandeen.net (sandeen.net [63.231.237.45]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VzC47eA4LHOn9UNh for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 05:24:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <527B948C.9060905@sandeen.net> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 07:24:28 -0600 From: Eric Sandeen MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: xfstest failures References: <20131106105451.GA31283@infradead.org> <20131106161825.GU1935@sgi.com> <527A887F.2030807@sandeen.net> <20131107081710.GC25157@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20131107081710.GC25157@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ben Myers , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/7/13, 2:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:20:47PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> that's right, it's a known bug w/ a testcase but no fix yet. >> >> I looked a bit, but ugh, xfsdump. > > Maybe it's time you come up with an xfail mechanism at least? What's the proposal there, a "fail" group for things known to still fail everywhere? so i.e. ./check -x fail ? I can easily send a patch for that if that's what folks want. -Eric _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs