From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601157FCC for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 11:53:52 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <527BD39F.3020201@sgi.com> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:53:35 -0600 From: Mark Tinguely MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: posix_memalign and io_submit do not set errno References: <20131107170045.GA6599@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20131107170045.GA6599@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/07/13 11:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > posix_memalign and io_submit do not set errno, but rather return the > error respectively the negated error directly. > > Found this out while figuring out why 240 reported an impossible error > from io_submit when run on NFS. > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Looks like that took care of all the non-conforming posix_memalign and io_[submit | cancel | destroy | getevents | setup] calls in xfstests sources. Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs