From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B4C7F96 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 03:31:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8856C8F804B for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 01:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TH9vPKjhAcFP10FN for ; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 01:31:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <527E00EF.2060304@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 03:31:27 -0600 From: Stan Hoeppner MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: How to feel the real time feature of XFS from userspace References: <527DEB69.8050502@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <527DEB69.8050502@oracle.com> Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jeff Liu , harryxiyou Cc: zwu.kernel@gmail.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On 11/9/2013 1:59 AM, Jeff Liu wrote: > On 11/09/2013 01:23 PM, harryxiyou wrote: > BTW, I remember Dave once mentioned that the realtime feature on Linux is not widely > tested and not recommended for production use. He's mentioned this fact many times. He's also mentioned the fact that the name "realtime device" is quite misleading. -- Stan _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs